|
Post by gajeel23 on Jan 8, 2016 14:36:13 GMT
I have a question. So I'm ninja using spec bow(surge/ganei)with stats agi crt str. (Str is ~145 atm) but the atk didn't rise with str so I got an admantite arrow and the atk went from ~1750 to ~1950
Well the question here is: how does this special equipment work exactly? Is this good rise in atk?
|
|
|
Post by Owe on Jan 8, 2016 15:01:47 GMT
I'm about 90% sure that admanite arrows adds 1.1 atk per Str. That's around 160 atk and the other 40 probably came from the Atk% on your equips
|
|
|
Post by gajeel23 on Jan 8, 2016 15:03:16 GMT
I'm about 90% sure that admanite arrows adds 1.1 atk per Str. That's around 160 atk and the other 40 probably came from the Atk% on your equips Do u know if it's the same as if I was using sword and str? Or do we admantite arrows users get less atk then those sword str classes
|
|
|
Post by Owe on Jan 8, 2016 15:12:22 GMT
I'm about 90% sure that admanite arrows adds 1.1 atk per Str. That's around 160 atk and the other 40 probably came from the Atk% on your equips Do u know if it's the same as if I was using sword and str? Or do we admantite arrows users get less atk then those sword str classes Well admanite arrows only works with bows or special bows, but it depends on which build you decide on and which type of bow that you want to use Normal swords get +3 Atk from Str and +1 atk from Dex Normal bows get +2 atk from Str and +2 atk from Dex So at max Str and Dex you would have more atk from bows if you use admanite arrow
|
|
|
Post by gajeel23 on Jan 8, 2016 15:25:15 GMT
Do u know if it's the same as if I was using sword and str? Or do we admantite arrows users get less atk then those sword str classes Well admanite arrows only works with bows or special bows, but it depends on which build you decide on and which type of bow that you want to use Normal swords get +3 Atk from Str and +1 atk from Dex Normal bows get +2 atk from Str and +2 atk from Dex So at max Str and Dex you would have more atk from bows if you use admanite arrow Tyvm that was the answer I was looking for
|
|