wafu
Member
Devote your Heart!
|
Post by wafu on Feb 5, 2020 14:20:44 GMT
can anyone giv the diff in atk/matk of weap that is @250ish and @300ish
|
|
x2nd
Member
Discord killer#0507. https://m.youtube.com/channel/UC4F8nJipoD9O5S7otkANkug/feed
|
Post by x2nd on Feb 5, 2020 14:36:52 GMT
can anyone giv the diff in atk/matk of weap that is @250ish and @300ish SPOILER: Click to hide {White Physical Damage Calculation}White Physical Damage = [ATK + Weapon ATK Value + Own Lv - Enemy Lv - Enemy DEF + (Random Numbers)] × (1 + Attribute Coefficient) + (Melee) Random Numbers = (RNG between 0 and Weapon ATK - 1) ÷ 5 SPOILER: Click to hide {Critical Damage}Critical damage = [White Physical Damage - Melee] × (1.5 + CRT ÷ 200) × (1 + Percentual Critical Damage) + (Melee) SPOILER: Click to hide {MATK}MATK = {[(Complete INT - 1) × 4 + (Complete DEX - 1) × 0.5 + (Weapon ATK IF using Rod, Throwing, or Magic Rod)] + Flat MATK Values} x [1 + Percentual MATK Values] Read more: irunaonline.boards.net/thread/10732/unwritten-formulas#ixzz6D5fBtU14 |
|
Niu
Member
last played in 2020
|
Post by Niu on Feb 5, 2020 15:10:40 GMT
Short answer to the question is difference in ATK and MATK between @250 and @300 weapons both refined to +9 without any ATK/MATK+%:
1.83 x (300 - 250) = 92
-
I tested this with Saint's Scripture+8 @300 and Freesia Rod+8 @251. Raw values after removing all MATK+% and ATK+% (including those given by the weapons): Tested on bish:
SS @300: ATK 1038 MATK 3925
FR @251: ATK 957 MATK 3810 ATK difference: 81 MATK difference: 115
Tested on ninja: SS @300: ATK 2426 MATK 630
FR @251: ATK 2345 MATK 543
ATK difference: 81 MATK difference: 87
The results are different for MATK probably because of bishop passives, I don't know. These are both +8 though so really I compared @300 x 1.66 =498 and @251 x 1.66 = 416. The difference a gets a little higher with +9 refinement because then you would compare @300 x 1.83 = 549 and @251 x 1.83 = 459. Also of course all +% ATK/MATK makes the realistic difference higher. -
edit: x2nd I forgot to try to look that up  At least the formula holds up, difference between @498 and @416 is 82, some wrong rounding and you get 81. For some reason I didn't think it was that simple haha. MATK should be the same but I probably made some mistake, close enough. So as for ATK the formula is the same ATK = {[sum((Complete Xn - 1) × Yn)) + (Weapon ATK)] + Flat ATK Values} x [1 + Percentual ATK Values], where Xn=stat giving ATK, Yn=amount of ATK per stat -
Easy calculation for the difference in ATK between two weapons with same amount of ATK+% (should be the same for MATK using MATK+%) is
(1 + All ATK+%) x [(Weapon A ATK) x (Weapon A Refine) - (Weapon B ATK) x (Weapon B Refine)] or if refinement is the same,
(1 + All ATK+%) x Refine x (Weapon A ATK - Weapon B ATK) +0 1
+1 1.01
+2 1.04
+3 1.09
+4 1.16
+5 1.25
+6 1.36
+7 1.50
+8 1.66
+9 1.83 |
|
°Malice°
Member
Do you breath in dreams?
|
weap atk
Feb 6, 2020 12:24:00 GMT
via mobile
x2nd likes this
Post by °Malice° on Feb 6, 2020 12:24:00 GMT
Thers a big gap if compared between atk 250 and 300. For me 290 atk still can be good compared to atk 300 but maybe in a very little difference after dmg multiplication.
Max atk weapon (no sr) is ridiculously expensive. I dont recommend u to get max atk on weapon unless if u can afford it.
|
|
At least the formula holds up, difference between @498 and @416 is 82, some wrong rounding and you get 81. For some reason I didn't think it was that simple haha. MATK should be the same but I probably made some mistake, close enough. So as for ATK the formula is the same
